Compensation Planning for Churches, Part 3
How to avoid costly penalties when setting pay

Editor's Note: Today is part three of a multiple-part series reviewing church compensation planning that complies with IRS guidelines. Part one looked at why churches should carefully think through what qualifies as compensation and taxes on compensation. Part two described how to determine the compensation "umbrella"—the maximum amount that may be paid to an employee.

Nonprofit organizations, as a general rule, are prohibited from participating in transactions that are deemed to be excess benefit transactions. These are transactions that involve disqualified persons and the provision of benefits in excess of what the organization receives in return for the benefit.

An organization is not allowed to pay more compensation than is reasonable for the services provided by the employee. Any compensation paid above reasonable compensation or above the "umbrella" to a disqualified person is considered to be an excess benefit transaction.

Disqualified Persons

Disqualified persons are generally officers, directors, trustees, and key employees of an organization. In addition, the term also includes the family members of any of these individuals. This group is generally the movers, shakers, and decision makers of the organization and their families.

It is important that this group of people be identified so that the organization can properly handle any transaction related to a member of this group. Compensation is one of those areas that require special attention for this group.

Individual Penalties

As described above, payment of unreasonable compensation creates an excess benefit transaction for a disqualified person. Excess benefit transactions are subject to a set of penalties called intermediate sanctions. These sanctions are assessed to the recipient of the excess benefit and to anyone who agreed to it.

If an excess benefit occurs, the following consequences apply:

  1. The benefit is required to be repaid to the organization; and
  2. The disqualified person is required to pay a penalty or tax to the IRS of 25 percent of the amount of the benefit.

If the IRS discovers the transaction and that it has not been corrected, additional penalties may be assessed to the disqualified person equaling 200 percent of the benefit.

If someone else within the organization agrees to the transaction giving rise to the excess benefit transaction, they can be assessed a penalty of 10%. This includes such persons as other officers, directors, and trustees.

Organizational Penalties

Nonprofit organizations are prohibited from entering into transactions that create inurement of benefit to control parties, i.e., disqualified persons. The Internal Revenue Code indicates that the mere existence of inurement of benefit is grounds for revocation of the organization's exempt status. Virtually all excess benefit transactions create inurement of benefit. Therefore, if an excess benefit transaction occurs, the IRS has grounds to revoke the tax exempt status of the organization.

Normally the IRS will use the above described sanctions to punish the guilty insider and not revoke tax exempt status unless the activity is egregious. However, the law allows the IRS to both revoke the tax exempt status of the organization as well as assess the individual penalties described above.

Conclusion

Defining the "umbrella" of reasonable compensation is critical to avoiding the creation of excess benefit transactions and the related consequences of such transactions as well as being vital to protecting the tax exempt status of the organization.

Next in the series:Noncash benefits must count as compensation

For more in-depth information on how the U.S. tax code relates to church compensation, see the2012 Church & Clergy Tax Guide by Richard Hammar.

This content is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. "From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations

Comments

Displaying 1–1 of 1 comments

Ivan

July 18, 2013  8:58pm

Another fine example of our gronvnmeet in action. This is a prime reason we should turn *all* our health care system over to the feds. Everything they touch works perfectly.

Report Abuse
Recent Posts
Subscribe to Church, Law & Tax

Resources

Managing Stress for Church Leaders

Managing Stress for Church Leaders

Discover the causes of stress and ways to keep your church workers healthy.
Lay Counseling Safety

Lay Counseling Safety

Manage the legal and ethical risks that arise in lay counseling and other spiritual care ministries.