Senate's Tax Reform Could Greatly Impact Charities

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and Ranking Member Orrin Hatch publicly announced Friday their much-anticipated plan for next steps on comprehensive tax reform. The announcement and a related letter to Senate colleagues made clear the Finance Committee's strategy to start tax reform from a "blank slate," meaning "a tax code without all of the special provisions in the form of exclusions, deductions and credits."

While this approach may be one way to achieve a "simpler, more efficient and fairer tax code" as suggested by Senators Baucus and Hatch, it does put at risk the charitable contribution deduction, which is vital to religious and other nonprofit organizations. As expressed in my comments submitted to the House Ways & Means Committee in February 2013, "ECFA is deeply concerned by any tax reform proposals that would reduce or eliminate the value of the charitable contribution deduction under section 170 of the tax code, which has traditionally been regarded as the most effective policy tool at the government's disposal to encourage individual charitable giving."

Besides the charitable contribution deduction, some of the other important provisions affecting religious and other nonprofits include the clergy housing exclusion and exclusion for employer contributions to health insurance and other fringe benefits. (The Joint Committee on Taxation has compiled a list of special tax provisions under consideration.)

Recognizing the important public policy purposes achieved by these provisions in the existing tax code, the senators have requested input until July 26 as to which exclusions, deductions, and credits should be preserved in the course of tax reform. To be preserved, it must be clear that any special provision will (1) help grow the economy, (2) make the tax code fairer, or (3) effectively promote other important policy objectives.

In the coming days and weeks ahead, ECFA will be working with a broad coalition of religious and other charities across the country to provide input to Congress on these key issues related to comprehensive tax reform.

This text is provided with the understanding that ECFA is not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or service. Professional advice on specific issues should be sought from an accountant, lawyer, or other professional.

This content is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. "From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations

Comments

Displaying 1–2 of 2 comments

Louise James

April 04, 2014  7:09am

I was just talking about this, this morning - I hear all the time people giving to charity as TAX offset, maybe this is not the best reason to do so..

Report Abuse

Richard Meek

July 05, 2013  4:38pm

If the only reason people give to churches and charities is to get a tax deduction, their motivation is wrong. Getting government out of the business of choosing "winners and losers" in the receipt of individual's charitable giving is better than defending what would lead us back to the unfair, immoral tax code we have today. A flat tax at a fair rate might lead to more justice for all citizens, at leas as far as the confiscation of our earnings goes.

Report Abuse
Recent Posts
Subscribe to Church, Law & Tax

Resources

Setting a Pastor's Pay

Setting a Pastor's Pay

Richard Hammar explains legal and tax matters for planning the pastors compensation.
Avoiding Costly Tax-filing Mistakes

Avoiding Costly Tax-filing Mistakes

Describes several common errors to watch out for when filing minister's taxes.