• A federal court in Iowa rejected the claim that the employment of a full-time chaplain at a public hospital violated the first amendment's nonestablishment of religion clause. The court acknowledged that a public hospital's employment of a chaplain violated the nonestablishment of religion clause, but concluded that such a practice was validated by the first amendment's other religion clause (guaranteeing the free exercise of religion). The court referred to decisions upholding the constitutionality of military and prison chaplains. Like military personnel and prison inmates, hospital patients often are isolated and restricted in the exercise of their religion. The provision of a chaplain in all of these cases , concluded the court, is necessary to ensure that the constitutional right to freely exercise one's religion is protected. However, the court cautioned that the hospital chaplain's ...
Join now to access this member-only content
Already a member? Log in for full access.