Jump directly to the content

Insuring Against Embezzlement

Court rules that insurance policy covered employees' embezzlement.

Alabama
State:

Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Tuscaloosa County Parking and Transit Authority, 2002 WL 254108 (Ala. 2002).

A public charity purchased a "fidelity" insurance policy that provided coverage in the event of various kinds of employee theft or dishonesty. Over the course of a few years, two employees embezzled over $300,000 by issuing payroll checks to themselves in excess of their salaries. When the scam was detected, the charity sought to recover its losses from its fidelity insurer. The insurer denied coverage on the basis of a provision in the policy that excluded coverage for any "salaries." The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that the exclusion did not apply, since the employees' payment of amounts to themselves in excess of their stated salaries could not reasonably be construed as "salaries" and so the policy exclusion did not apply. It concluded, "Embezzled ...

Join now to access this member-only content

Become a Member

Already a member? for full access.

Related Topics:
Posted:
  • May 1, 2003

Related ResourcesVisit Store

2021 Church & Clergy Tax Guide (Book)
2021 Church & Clergy Tax Guide (Book)
The most comprehensive and authoritative tax guide available.
Understanding Church Insurance
Understanding Church Insurance
Understand your church's insurance needs to be assured you have adequate coverage.
Best Practices for Technology Usage
Best Practices for Technology Usage
Establish policies and best practices to govern the use of technology for church staff.
Internal Controls for Church Finances
Internal Controls for Church Finances
Learn how to protect your church's money.