Jump directly to the content

Protecting Against Embezzlement of Church Funds

What church leaders should do to prevent internal theft.

Coleman v. State, 2006 WL 3513407 (Miss. 2006)

Background. Two deacons were responsible for collecting offerings from church members, depositing the funds into the church's bank account, and paying for authorized maintenance and repairs to the church building and facilities. Both deacons were authorized to sign checks individually, without the safeguard of requiring two signatories. They were not, however, authorized to make expenditures without the approval of the members, which was determined at meetings held after church services.

Over the course of six months, one of the deacons (the "defendant") wrote checks totaling $1,600 to himself, with no documentation showing that he used the funds to pay for expenditures authorized by the congregation. When the other deacon became aware of the defendant's behavior, he notified law enforcement officials. An investigation was initiated ...

Join now to access this member-only content

Become a Member

Already a member? for full access.

Related Topics:
Posted:
  • July 2, 2007

Related ResourcesVisit Store

2021 Church & Clergy Tax Guide (Book)
2021 Church & Clergy Tax Guide (Book)
The most comprehensive and authoritative tax guide available.
50-State Public Accommodations Laws Report
50-State Public Accommodations Laws Report
How statutes and court decisions across the country do - or don't affect churches
Your Complete Guide to Virtual Church Meetings
Your Complete Guide to Virtual Church Meetings
A toolkit for legal and compliant business meetings
Church Finance
Church Finance
Learn about budgeting, financial reporting, tax compliance, insurance coverage, and more.