• Key point. State laws imposing harsher penalties upon crimes committed in churches than in other locations do not impermissibly prefer churches in violation of the first amendment's "nonestablishment of religion" clause.
A Florida court upheld a state law imposing harsher penalties upon persons who damage church property than other kinds of property. A defendant was convicted of defacing church properties by spray—painting them with anti—religious symbols and words. His sentence was harsher because state law imposed increased penalties upon those who deface religious property. The defendant appealed his conviction, arguing that the state law unconstitutionally favored religion. A state court rejected this argument and upheld the validity of the law. The court applied the United States Supreme Court's three—part Lemon test for determining whether or not the Florida ...
Join now to access this member-only content
Become a Member
Already a member? Log in for full access.
Related ResourcesVisit Store
Managing Church Facility Use
Find insights to equip your church to host members and strangers.
Planning a Church Building Project
Learn about zoning laws, property sales, church construction, financing, and more.
Avoiding Church Lawsuits
Create proactive procedures to avoid common reasons why churches most often go to court.
Understanding Church Insurance
Understand your church's insurance needs to be assured you have adequate coverage.
