Recent Developments

Issues that affect ministers and churches
Personal Injuries on Church Property and During Church Activities - Part 3
A New York court upheld the validity of a state law making it a crime to operate a motor vehicle while using a cell phone.
Key point 10-02. The doctrine of respondeat superior imposes vicarious liability on employers for the negligent acts of their employees committed within the scope of their employment.
Key point 10-11. A church may be legally responsible on the basis of negligent supervision for injuries resulting from a failure to exercise adequate supervision of its programs and activities.

Negligence as a Basis for Liability

* A New York court upheld the validity of a state law making it a crime to operate a motor vehicle while using a cell phone. A woman was seen using a hand-held cell phone by a police officer who immediately pulled her over and issued her a ticket. The woman claimed that the New York "cell phone law" violates both the New York and United States Constitutions. Specifically, she claimed that the law was too vague, invaded the privacy of citizens, and violated the Constitution's guaranty of the equal protection of the laws. The court began its opinion by noting, "From the mid 1990's onward, the ubiquitous presence of the wireless telephone, or cell phone has spread throughout the country, and it appears most visible in the various metropolitan areas. With roughly 80 million cell phone users, there has been an increase in the number of motor vehicle accidents, some fatal, that resulted from the use of these hand-held phones, where the operator maintains less than full-time attention to the operation of the motor vehicle." In 2001 New York became one of the first states in the nation to enact a law prohibiting use of hand held cell phones while operating a motor vehicle. The court conceded that a law that is so vague that a reasonable person of ordinary intelligence is unable to ascertain what conduct is prohibited is void. However, the cell phone law was not invalid on this ground. To the contrary, the law simply states, "No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway using a mobile telephone to engage in a call while such vehicle is in motion." The law distinguishes between the prohibited "mobile telephones" and the permitted "hands free mobile telephone" where the operator of the motor vehicle can maintain "both hands" on the applicable steering device. This language "is clear and indisputable to the ordinary citizen."

Log In For Full Access

Interested in becoming a member? Learn more.

Related Topics:
Posted: March 3, 2003
View All
from our store
Safety On the Road

Safety On the Road

Discover the best ways to transport people safely.

ChurchSalary

ChurchSalary

Let ChurchSalary do the work. Get personalized compensation reports for staff and pastors.