• Key point: A confession made to a minister may not be protected from disclosure by the clergy-penitent privilege if the confessor intended that the minister communicate the confession to a third party.
• A New York court ruled that a confession made by a rapist to a minister was not protected by the clergy-penitent privilege since the rapist intended that his confession be communicated to a third party. A rapist, soon after raping a woman, contacted a minister and asked him to tell the woman that he “was sorry.” The minister disclosed this conversation during the trial of the rapist and was instrumental in his conviction. The rapist appealed his conviction on the ground that the statement he made to the minister was protected by the clergy-penitent privilege and should not have been disclosed in court. New York law specifies that “[u]nless the person confessing or confiding waives the privilege, a clergyman, or other minister of any religion … shall not be allowed to disclose a confession or confidence made to him in his professional character as spiritual advisor.” A state appeals court rejected this argument, noting that “[t]he apology, as an admission intended to be passed on to a third party, was excluded neither by the hearsay rule nor … the clergyman-penitent privilege ….” People v. Dixon, 604 N.Y.S.2d 604 (A.D. 2 Dept. 1993).
See Also: Fraudulent Practices
© Copyright 1994, 1998 by Church Law & Tax Report. All rights reserved. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Church Law & Tax Report, PO Box 1098, Matthews, NC 28106.Reference Code: m33 c0494