Recent Developments in Louisiana Regarding Libel and Slander

A Louisiana court ruled that it could resolve a priest’s claim that he had been defamed by statements church officials made to the media.

Church Law and Tax1998-05-01

Libel and Slander

Key point. Statements made in the course of internal church disciplinary proceedings ordinarily cannot be defamatory, but some courts recognize an exception to this rule if information shared in such proceedings is disclosed to persons outside of the church.

A Louisiana court ruled that it could resolve a priest’s claim that he had been defamed by statements church officials made to the media. A Catholic priest who had been accused of molesting a child was investigated by church officials. He later filed a lawsuit claiming that the investigating officials had defamed him by making unauthorized disclosures to the media about the case, and interfered with his future employment. The church officials asserted that the civil courts had no authority to resolve the priest’s lawsuit since it was an internal matter of church discipline. A state appeals court disagreed.


The court began its opinion by observing:

Society does not view child molestation as a matter of religious doctrine, as distinguished from, say, the procedures within the church necessary to atone for such a sin. Child sexual abuse is anathema to society in general, even to atheists. It is prohibited by secular laws. The public has an interest in matters of child molestation. Therefore, where child molestation is at issue, it cannot be considered just an internal matter of church discipline or administration. Child molestation is distinguishable from those cases where religious figures claim that their reputations were damaged because they were found to be poor administrators or where their private conduct did not comport with church standards, but the issue was not one of the violation of secular criminal laws. The church cannot appropriate a matter with secular criminal implications by making it simultaneously a matter of internal church policy and discipline.

The court conceded that the civil courts cannot resolve defamation claims brought by clergy if the allegedly defamatory remarks were communicated only to church members in the context of a disciplinary hearing or proceeding. It observed:

It is one thing to say that churches must be free of governmental interference to conduct matters of internal discipline and organization, even when those matters touch upon the reputations of those affected. It is quite another to say that churches have the unfettered right to make unsubstantiated statements of an essentially secular nature to the media destructive of a priest’s character ….

The court cautioned that the priest “may be unable to prove his allegation of defamation through the news media,” but added that “we cannot say that this court lacks … jurisdiction over such an allegation.”

Interference with employment

The priest insisted that a church official interfered with his employment prospects as a Navy chaplain as a result of a letter of reference that referred to “some accusations of questionable behavior and some complaints about [the priest’s] ministry.” The church official insisted that the letter of reference pertained to the fitness of the priest for assignment to a chaplaincy position-a matter beyond the reach of the civil courts. The court did not address this issue directly, but seemed to acknowledge that internal communications among clergy or church leaders regarding the fitness of a minister cannot give rise to civil liability.

Application. There are a couple of aspects to this decision that are of special significance to church leaders. First, the court conceded that statements made among members in the course of church disciplinary proceedings cannot be defamatory. However, it recognized an exception to this rule in the context of “leaks” of information by church officials to outsiders, including the media. Second, the court seemed to support the general rule that the civil courts have no authority to review disputes concerning the selection or qualification of ministers. Hayden v. Schulte, 701 So.2d 1354 (La. App. 1997). [Defamati on]

This content is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. "From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations." Due to the nature of the U.S. legal system, laws and regulations constantly change. The editors encourage readers to carefully search the site for all content related to the topic of interest and consult qualified local counsel to verify the status of specific statutes, laws, regulations, and precedential court holdings.

ajax-loader-largecaret-downcloseHamburger Menuicon_amazonApple PodcastsBio Iconicon_cards_grid_caretChild Abuse Reporting Laws by State IconChurchSalary Iconicon_facebookGoogle Podcastsicon_instagramLegal Library IconLegal Library Iconicon_linkedinLock IconMegaphone IconOnline Learning IconPodcast IconRecent Legal Developments IconRecommended Reading IconRSS IconSubmiticon_select-arrowSpotify IconAlaska State MapAlabama State MapArkansas State MapArizona State MapCalifornia State MapColorado State MapConnecticut State MapWashington DC State MapDelaware State MapFederal MapFlorida State MapGeorgia State MapHawaii State MapIowa State MapIdaho State MapIllinois State MapIndiana State MapKansas State MapKentucky State MapLouisiana State MapMassachusetts State MapMaryland State MapMaine State MapMichigan State MapMinnesota State MapMissouri State MapMississippi State MapMontana State MapMulti State MapNorth Carolina State MapNorth Dakota State MapNebraska State MapNew Hampshire State MapNew Jersey State MapNew Mexico IconNevada State MapNew York State MapOhio State MapOklahoma State MapOregon State MapPennsylvania State MapRhode Island State MapSouth Carolina State MapSouth Dakota State MapTennessee State MapTexas State MapUtah State MapVirginia State MapVermont State MapWashington State MapWisconsin State MapWest Virginia State MapWyoming State IconShopping Cart IconTax Calendar Iconicon_twitteryoutubepauseplay