Callahan v. First Congregational Church, 808 N.E.2d 301 (Mass. Sup. 2004)
Key point 2-04.1. Most courts have concluded that they are barred by the first amendment guarantees of religious freedom and nonestablishment of religion from resolving challenges by dismissed clergy to the legal validity of their dismissals.
Key point 4-02.03. A number of defenses are available to one accused of defamation. These include truth, statements made in the course of judicial proceedings, consent, and self-defense. In addition, statements made to church members about a matter of common interest to members are protected by a "qualified privilege," meaning that they cannot be defamatory unless they are made with malice. In this context, malice means that the person making the statements knew that they were false or made them with a reckless disregard as to their truth or falsity. This privilege will ...
Join now to access this member-only content
Become a Member
Already a member? Log in for full access.
Related ResourcesVisit Store
Understanding Labor Laws
Regulations that pertain to hiring, firing, paying, disciplining, and supervising ministry employees.
Immigration & the Church
Keep your church safe and legal and as you strive to serve the immigrant communities in your context.
50-State Religious Freedom Laws Report
A review of state laws and court decisions affecting church leaders.
Sample Compensation Report
A ChurchSalary.com Sample Report for Determining Fair Compensation
