Jump directly to the content

Church Employee's Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Dismissed Due to Lack of 'Viable Claim'

Editor’s Note: In the November/December 2017 print issue of Church Law & Tax Report, this Recent Development misstated the employer that was sued in the court case and the name of the case. The employer should have been identified as a “denominationally affiliated hospital” and the case should have been named Peacock v. UPMC Presbyterian, 2016 WL 890574 (W.D. Pa. 2016). These corrections have been made in the version below.

Key Point 8-12.5 Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It consists of both "quid pro quo" harassment and "hostile environment" harassment. Religious organizations that are subject to Title VII are covered by this prohibition. An employer is automatically liable for supervisory employees' acts of harassment, but a defense is available to claims of hostile environment ...

Join now to access this member-only content

Become a Member

Already a member? for full access.

Related Topics:
  • October 18, 2017

Related ResourcesVisit Store

Your Guide to Employee Handbooks
Your Guide to Employee Handbooks
If updated regularly, an employee handbook can offer valuable legal protection against civil court claims made by disgruntled staff members.
Essential Guide to Employment Issues for Church Boards
Essential Guide to Employment Issues for Church Boards
Covers selection and screening, dispute resolution, terminations, discrimination, and minimum wage.