
What Conceal Carry Weapons Laws Mean for Churches
Video
Video
Essential questions and filing tips for ministers seeking a Social Security exemption through Form 4361. Understand the process and make informed decisions.
Last Reviewed: January 10, 2025
A minister’s earnings from performing ministerial duties are considered “net earnings from self-employment” under IRC Section 1402(a)(8). This means ministers are generally classified as self-employed for Social Security and Medicare purposes—even if considered common law employees for other tax purposes.
However, ministers may opt out of the Social Security system by filing Form 4361, Application for Exemption from Self Employment Tax for Use by Ministers, Members of Religious Orders, and Christian Science Practitioners. This article explains the qualifications, filing requirements, and important considerations for this decision.
Key Takeaways:
The exemption is available to ministers, members of religious orders, and Christian Science Practitioners. For ministers, the key qualifications include:
The IRS treats the terms “licensed,” “commissioned,” and “ordained” as interchangeable unless a church’s bylaws distinguish duties by credential level. Ministers should keep a copy of their church’s bylaws in case the IRS requests proof of their role.
The exemption is not granted for financial concerns or doubts about the Social Security system’s viability. Instead, it must stem from a minister’s:
Before approving a Form 4361, the IRS contacts the minister to confirm that their beliefs are sincerely held and require the minister to inform their ordaining body of the application.
Ministers must file Form 4361 by the due date of their tax return (including extensions) for the second year after they earned $400 or more in self-employment income from ministerial services. Filing late disqualifies the exemption, with no exceptions.
Steps to file:
If the form is not filed correctly or on time, the exemption is denied. Attempts to restart the filing deadline by obtaining new credentials are unlikely to succeed unless accompanied by a documented change in beliefs and churches.
Note: Ministers should retain a copy of the approved Form 4361. The IRS rarely provides replacements, and losing this document can lead to unexpected tax liabilities.
In most cases, the effective date of the exemption is the date the minister receives credentials. However, ministers must pay self-employment tax until the IRS approves the exemption. They can later amend returns to request refunds for overpaid taxes, if applicable.
Once granted, the exemption cannot be revoked at the minister’s discretion. It is only nullified if approval was based on incorrect information or financial motives. Congress has occasionally allowed ministers to re-enter the system, but these opportunities are rare, with the last occurring in 1999.
Opting out of Social Security is a significant and permanent decision. Young ministers should not file Form 4361 solely because it seems like a “good deal.” Filing requires an understanding of the requirements and consequences, including:
As noted in Church Compensation, Second Edition, ministers should plan ahead to ensure they can cover future financial needs. Waiting until age 60 or older to address these concerns is too late.
Why this task can’t continue to be an afterthought for leaders.
Meeting minutes preserve actions taken during a church meeting for future reference. However, in many churches, the duty to record the minutes becomes the responsibility of an individual with little or no training in recording meeting minutes.
This often means the minutes will be insufficient, or worse, damaging to the church. A worst-case scenario exists where meeting minutes are not kept, therefore jeopardizing the ability of a church to document and demonstrate its actions.
Anyone with a role that involves capturing minutes from a church business or committee meeting should receive basic information on how to record and preserve meeting minutes.
The overall goal is to create a self-contained document to provide evidence of actions taken at a properly publicized, called, and run meeting. Minutes should show the meeting was properly called and noticed, that a quorum existed at the meeting, and that all decisions were approved by the required number of votes by qualified voters attending the meeting, in person, or, if permitted, by proxy. The meeting minutes should accurately report all decisions that occurred during the meeting.
These rules apply to member meetings, meetings of the board of directors (sometimes called a board of elders, a vestry, a session, or a church council), and all committee meetings.
To accomplish this, churches should establish procedures to assist the volunteers and staff members who oversee this vital governance function. These procedures should include guidance in the following areas:
Every state’s nonprofit corporate statute requires a nonprofit corporation to have a corporate secretary. While the statute allows churches to substitute a different name, the duties of the office of secretary in a church must equal or exceed the duties contained in the statute. In some churches, the office is called “Church Clerk,” or something similar. In addition, a church’s bylaws may add additional duties and/or provide details about how the secretary is to perform his/her duties.
The corporate secretary must record and keep minutes from all corporate meetings. The bylaws also usually require the corporate secretary to record minutes from board and committee meetings. In some cases, an assistant secretary may be appointed to assist with these duties, or each committee is authorized to appoint its own secretary. In any instance, it is important for a church to determine if each of its governing bodies has a properly appointed person to be responsible for the minutes of its meetings.
Training should focus on the information the minutes must contain. The minutes should demonstrate everything that would be necessary to prove that the decisions were made at a properly called and noticed meeting, along with the actions taken. To assist in this education, the church may wish to have its secretary(ies) receive training from the church’s legal counsel.
At a minimum, the minutes should contain:
Many times minutes contain unnecessary information that may be harmful to the church. The minutes should not contain any discussions between members regarding matters placed before them or any details about the deliberative process that preceded decisions. The minutes should not include the contents of executive sessions, but the minutes should reflect that the members went in and out of executive session. No decisions should be made while in executive session. Executive sessions should be used for discussion about personnel, legal issues, and potential liability issues.
The minutes should not contain any discussions with attorneys, certified public accountants, and insurance adjusters that may be privileged. However, minutes should include decisions made as a result of discussions with attorneys, CPAs, and adjusters.
Securing the minutes
Taking sufficient minutes won’t protect the church if the minutes are not secured. It is not uncommon for minutes to be maintained by individuals and then kept by those individuals off church property. Since minutes are considered permanent documents, the church must establish how the minutes are submitted to the church so they can be secured with other permanent records of the church. If minutes are kept by individuals, then they risk being lost or inadvertently destroyed.
Minutes matter
Minutes matter. They are a record of the church’s history, and often play an important role in future events. Care should be taken to maintain accurate minutes of every meeting of your church.
Explore how indefinite housing allowances and safety nets can help churches avoid administrative oversights.
Q: Approximately 10 years ago, the church board approved a resolution that any minister employed by the church is automatically approved for any housing allowance request. Is that valid?
Many churches choose not to limit housing allowances to a particular calendar year. For instance, if a church designates $12,000 of its senior pastor’s salary in 2014 as a housing allowance, the resolution could specify that the allowance is effective for calendar year 2014 and all future years unless otherwise provided.
This “indefinite” approach may protect ministers if the board neglects to designate an allowance before the start of a future year. However, it is important to note that this method has not been explicitly considered or approved by the IRS or any court, leaving its validity uncertain.
To address contingencies like midyear staff changes, delayed designations, or other unforeseen circumstances, churches may adopt a “safety net” designation. This could include a clause stating that a specific percentage (e.g., 40 percent) of each minister’s compensation is designated as a housing allowance for the current and future years unless otherwise specified.
However, these designations should not replace annual housing allowance resolutions for each minister. Instead, they serve as a safeguard to prevent the loss of this important tax benefit due to administrative oversight.
Churches should consider implementing a “safety net” housing allowance to protect ministers against the inadvertent failure to designate a timely allowance. While these measures can mitigate risk, they do not replace the need for annual, individual designations for each minister on staff.
An indefinite housing allowance is a resolution that applies to the current and future years without requiring an annual designation, unless otherwise stated.
No, the IRS and courts have not explicitly addressed or approved the use of indefinite housing allowances, leaving their validity uncertain.
A safety net housing allowance is a designation that applies to all ministers on staff, often as a percentage of their compensation, to protect against missed or delayed designations.
No, safety net allowances should complement, not replace, annual housing allowance designations for each minister.
While indefinite and safety net housing allowances provide safeguards against administrative oversight, they should not replace the annual designation process for each minister. Churches are encouraged to consult resources like the Church & Clergy Tax Guide and work with a tax professional to ensure compliance and maximize the benefits of housing allowances.
Practical steps to prevent embezzlement in churches by strengthening internal controls and financial practices.
Last Reviewed: January 26, 2025
Sadly, embezzlement is an all too common problem in churches. Often poor internal controls, such as those listed below, are the reason it occurs.
How embezzlement may occur: This person may remove cash, especially if not in an offering envelope.
Preventative action: Have more than one person count each offering. The more people involved, the lower the risk of embezzlement.
Don’t wait – become a Church Law & Tax Advantage Member today!
How embezzlement may occur: The same two people count church offerings every week. After a number of years, they agree to remove cash and divide it between them.
Preventative action: A pool of counters should be identified, and each offering should be counted by a randomly selected number of people from this pool.
How embezzlement may occur: An usher collects offerings in the church balcony during each service; while carrying offerings down a stairway to a counting room, he or she pockets all loose bills.
Preventative action: There should be at least two people who collect the offering in the balcony, and they should accompany each other down the stairs to the counting room. Further, these individuals should be rotated.
How embezzlement may occur: The counters provide the individual who deposits the offering with a count. This individual disregards the count, withholds several bills unaccompanied by offering envelopes, and then deposits the lower amount.
Preventative action: Different individuals should count and deposit church offerings. A person who neither counts offerings nor deposits them with a bank should be assigned the responsibility of reconciling offering counts with the bank deposit slips.
How embezzlement may occur: A church only assigns an employee to reconcile the first offering of each month with a bank deposit slip. The person who deposits offerings is aware of this practice, and embezzles loose cash before depositing offerings from the remaining services of each month.
Preventative action: Offering counts and bank deposit slips should be reconciled for every service. Or, reconcile offering counts with monthly bank statements.
How embezzlement may occur: A church employee is given sole signature authority on the church’s checking account. The employee pays for a number of personal expenses with this checking account.
Preventative action: At least two signatures should be required for all checks.
How embezzlement may occur: This is one of the major causes of embezzlement. People who embezzle church funds often restrict their activities to cash that was not contributed in an offering envelope. Embezzlers assume that it will be more difficult to detect their behavior under these circumstances, since the church cannot provide these donors with a receipt for their contributions (that will reveal discrepancies).
Preventative action: Churches should provide offering envelopes to all members for each week, and also place them in church pews for easy access. Members should periodically be encouraged to use offering envelopes. While they are not required to substantiate charitable contributions, they do reduce the risk of embezzlement. Also, offering counts should note (as a subtotal) loose cash unaccompanied by offering envelopes. This practice will reveal fluctuations that may indicate embezzlement, and will serve as a deterrent.
How embezzlement may occur: A church does not provide members with receipts of their contributions. A church employee embezzles cash (whether or not accompanied by an offering envelope), knowing that the risk of discovery is remote. The same risk exists if a church issues contribution receipts but does not actively encourage members to verify the accuracy of these receipts.
Preventative action: Churches should issue a contribution receipt to each donor, and encourage donors to immediately call to the attention of church leaders any discrepancies between their own records and the amount reflected on the church receipt. Discrepancies should not be reported to the person who prepares contribution receipts.
How embezzlement may occur: When offerings are not promptly deposited, the risk of embezzlement increases since funds are accessible longer. Further, some people may claim they “reimbursed” themselves out of church funds for unauthorized expenses.
Preventative action: Offerings should be deposited promptly with a bank.
How embezzlement may occur: A church bookkeeper writes a check to a fictitious company, then cashes it. The bookkeeper is responsible for reconciling bank statements and does not disclose the embezzlement.
Preventative action: Monthly bank statements should be reviewed by a church official or employee having no responsibility for handling cash or writing checks (ideally, the statements should be sent to this individual’s residence). This form of embezzlement also can be avoided by requiring two signatures on all checks.
How embezzlement may occur: A church employee claims to have purchased equipment for church use, and is reimbursed without substantiation. In fact, the purchase was solely for personal use.
Preventative action: Do not reimburse any employee’s purchase of church supplies or equipment without first obtaining proof that the purchase was duly authorized; also insist on seeing a receipt documenting what was purchased and its price.
Key strategies and lessons to help churches prevent embezzlement and promote financial accountability.
Last Reviewed: January 26, 2025
Embezzlement remains a significant risk for churches, often resulting from poor internal controls. This real-life case demonstrates the consequences of lax financial practices and the importance of preventative measures.
A church’s chief financial officer embezzled $850,000 in funds over several years using various fraudulent methods. These included forging signatures, issuing unauthorized checks, and misusing church credit cards. The theft not only caused significant financial loss but also resulted in legal and tax consequences for the perpetrator.
Church leaders can prevent embezzlement by implementing these internal controls:
Sharing or dividing tasks significantly reduces the risk of embezzlement. For example:
Digital signatures and stamps must be stored securely with restricted access. If secure storage is not feasible, avoid using them altogether.
A CPA audit provides a management letter identifying deficiencies in internal controls. This proactive step can help churches address vulnerabilities and prevent misappropriation of funds.
If embezzlement is suspected but the full amount is unknown, churches can file Form 3949-A with the IRS. This allows the IRS to investigate and assess criminal sanctions for unreported taxable income.
Many churches avoid implementing internal controls for fear of offending staff. However, financial accountability should take precedence over hurt feelings. Donors trust that their contributions are used for religious purposes, and churches have a duty to uphold this trust.
Churches must prioritize financial accountability to prevent embezzlement. Implementing robust internal controls and promoting a culture of transparency can safeguard church funds and maintain donor trust.
Discover how comparative ratios and benchmarks can help evaluate your church’s financial performance against peers.
If you’re ready to go beyond internal comparisons and start looking more broadly at your church’s financial performance, comparative ratios are the next step.
Ratios can be a key indicator of how well a church is functioning in comparison to its peers. Not only is the actual ratio important, but also understanding how it fits in the range of peers, and which churches are included as “peers.”
If your financial information is compared to your peers’, it may be helpful to calculate both the average (mean) and the mid-point (median). The benefit of calculating both the mean and median is to reveal the spread of results in the range. If both the mean and median are numbers that are close together, then most of the ratio results in the range are close together and the average is likely to be very useful. If the mean and median are far apart, then the underlying organizations’ results are spread out and the average is less important.
An individual that works with church ratios extensively finds it useful to show a minimum and maximum in each range. This lets you know how close you are to the top or bottom of the range. Depending on the ratio observed (for example, average salary per full-time equivalent), it may be beneficial to know how close to the high or low your church is in the particular range.
Another key to properly interpreting the ratios is to understand the demographics of the other participants in the range, beyond the minimum and maximum in the range. It is important to consider how many participants are in the ratio averages your church is using as a benchmark. An average ratio calculated with only a few churches may be much different than one calculated with several churches.
It is also important to benchmark your church against others similar in size and region of the country. For example, property and equipment per full-time equivalent employee may be significantly different for churches in the Midwest than ones on the West Coast, due to higher property costs in the West.
Benchmarking against organizations with similar asset sizes may be very misleading because organizations with older properties tend to have smaller property and equipment values due to depreciated property values. Perhaps a better way to group peer organizations is by arranging organizations together that have a similar average number of attendees (excluding children), or by the size of unrestricted charitable contributions.
There are various ways to benchmark your church against other churches. You may do it informally yourself or opt to get outside information.
Q1: What are comparative ratios in church finances?
A: Comparative ratios evaluate how well a church is functioning financially compared to its peers. They provide insights into averages, medians, and ranges within similar organizations.
Q2: Why is it important to calculate both the mean and median when comparing ratios?
A: Calculating both helps reveal the spread of results. If the mean and median are close, the average is useful. If they are far apart, it indicates a wide range of results, making the average less reliable.
Q3: How can benchmarking improve financial analysis for churches?
A: Benchmarking helps compare your church’s financial metrics with similar organizations, considering factors like size, region, and property costs. This ensures more accurate and relevant comparisons.
Q4: Why should churches consider regional differences when benchmarking?
A: Regional differences, such as property costs, can significantly affect financial metrics. For example, West Coast churches often have higher property costs than Midwest churches, impacting benchmarks like property per full-time employee.
Q5: What is the benefit of including minimum and maximum values in ratio ranges?
A: This helps identify how close your church is to the top or bottom of a range. And this information provides better context for financial performance.
Q6: What are some common ways to group churches for benchmarking?
A: Churches can be grouped by attendee numbers, region, or unrestricted charitable contributions. Avoid grouping solely by asset size, as depreciated property values may skew results.
Q7: How can churches access external benchmarking data?
A: Churches can benchmark informally by comparing metrics on their own or by obtaining data from external sources that specialize in church financial benchmarks.
Determine if clergy car repair reimbursements qualify as taxable income based on IRS and church guidelines.
Last Reviewed: January 8, 2025
Q: I need help with a question regarding money requested for our Deaf Church Pastor for car repairs. The Deaf Church Committee voted to reimburse him for the car repairs but since this is not an actual church expense, it seems it should be considered a gift, and therefore taxable income. Their position is that it is a reimbursement and therefore not taxable. Help?
The answer largely depends on whether your church has adopted an accountable reimbursement plan. According to the IRS guidelines for reimbursement plans, these plans allow clergy to receive funds for business-related expenses without them being treated as taxable income. Here’s an explanation based on the Church & Clergy Tax Guide:
Under an accountable reimbursement plan, church reimbursements for employee business expenses are not reported as compensation on the employee’s Form W-2 or Form 1040. They are also not considered when computing automatic excess benefits. Adopting an accountable plan is a crucial element for handling clergy and employee expenses correctly.
To qualify as an accountable plan, the following four criteria must be met:
In the absence of an accountable plan, reimbursements are typically considered taxable income. They must be reported on the employee’s Form W-2 and are subject to federal income tax withholding, Social Security, and Medicare taxes.
For example, if your Deaf Church Pastor’s car repair expenses are reimbursed without an accountable plan in place, this amount is treated as taxable income, regardless of whether the church committee considers it a reimbursement or a gift.
To avoid confusion and ensure tax compliance, churches should implement an accountable reimbursement plan that adheres to IRS guidelines. This allows reimbursements to be excluded from taxable income while providing a clear structure for expense reporting.
An accountable reimbursement plan is an arrangement where employers reimburse employees for business-related expenses, provided specific IRS requirements are met.
Gifts to clergy are generally taxable unless they are classified as tax-exempt under specific circumstances, such as benevolence or charity.
Yes, if the car is used for business purposes related to clergy duties, such as traveling to multiple congregations or events.
Reimbursements are treated as taxable income and must be reported on the clergy’s tax filings.
Properly categorizing and managing clergy reimbursements, including car repairs, is essential for tax compliance. Churches are encouraged to adopt accountable reimbursement plans to avoid tax implications and ensure clarity in financial transactions.
Can a church refund charitable contributions? Discover legal considerations and best practices for handling refund requests.
Last Reviewed: January 24, 2025
Q: One of our board members gave the church a gift of $10,000 with no strings attached (his words). The church provided him with a contribution receipt. We had hoped to put that money toward a building project. Recently, the donor asked if he could have the money back for three months for an investment. Are we legally obligated to return his gift?
Most church leaders eventually face a request from a member to refund a charitable contribution. These requests often arise due to financial hardship or unexpected personal needs. While the situation may evoke empathy, it also presents complex legal and ethical considerations.
A charitable contribution is a gift of money or property to a charitable organization. Under the law, this is considered an irrevocable transfer of the donor’s entire interest in the donated funds or property. Since the donor relinquishes all ownership rights upon donation, it generally is not legally possible to recover the donated property.
In many cases, contributions are undesignated, meaning the donor does not specify how the funds should be used. For example, weekly contributions to a church’s general fund fall under this category. Undesignated contributions are unconditional gifts, and as such, the church has no legal obligation to return them. Returning these funds could also create legal and operational complications.
Churches should carefully consider their response to refund requests, keeping the following in mind:
Returning contributions can lead to several issues, including:
Churches should establish clear policies for charitable contributions to guide their responses to refund requests. These policies should include:
For more guidance, refer to chapter 8 of Richard Hammar’s Church & Clergy Tax Guide.
Pastors must meet strict substantiation requirements to claim deductions for business expenses like home offices and travel.
Last Reviewed: January 10, 2025
Pastors must meet strict substantiation requirements to claim deductions for business expenses like home offices and travel.
Pastors face unique challenges in claiming business expense deductions, including the need to meet strict substantiation requirements. This article explores a Tax Court case highlighting these rules and offers practical insights for pastors navigating similar issues.
A church provided its pastor with an office on campus and a $12,000 annual housing allowance. The pastor also used a home office, dedicating one room (approximately one-third of his rented home) for work-related activities. Expenses included computer supplies, books, and other items not reimbursed by the church. The pastor reported these expenses on his Schedule C as an independent contractor.
After the IRS denied several deductions, the pastor appealed to the United States Tax Court, which evaluated the case under strict substantiation requirements.
The Tax Court emphasized the importance of maintaining detailed records for certain expenses:
The “Cohan rule” allows for some estimated deductions if evidence exists, but stricter rules under section 274 of the tax code apply to specific expense categories.
The pastor claimed a deduction of $8,546 for home office expenses, calculated as one-third of his total housing costs. The Tax Court upheld the deduction, citing:
Many other claimed deductions, including supplies, meals, and entertainment, were disallowed due to insufficient documentation. The court noted that strict substantiation rules were not met.
This case highlights several important points for pastors:
They are IRS rules requiring detailed records, such as receipts and logs, for specific expenses to support deductions.
Pastors must prove exclusive and regular use of the space for business purposes to qualify for the deduction.
The “Cohan rule” permits estimates in some cases, but strict categories like travel and meals require detailed documentation.
Keep thorough records, including receipts and detailed logs, for all claimed expenses, especially those subject to strict substantiation.
Meeting IRS substantiation requirements is critical for pastors claiming business expense deductions. Accurate records and understanding applicable rules can help minimize the risk of denied deductions and audits.
Understand when to designate a pastor’s housing allowance and comply with IRS rules effectively.
Last Reviewed: September 3, 2025
Question: We have just discovered that our church failed to designate a housing allowance for our pastor. The pastor wants the board to adopt a resolution designating a percentage of his compensation as a housing allowance, and backdating it to January 1 of this year. Is this permissible?
Many churches face this situation: failing to designate a housing allowance by the end of a calendar year and realizing the omission weeks or months into the new year. Unfortunately, according to IRS regulations, housing allowances cannot be designated retroactively. A housing allowance “means an amount paid to a minister to rent or otherwise provide a home if such amount is designated as rental allowance pursuant to official action taken … in advance of such payment by the employing church or other qualified organization” (Treas. Reg. 1.107-1(b)).
A housing allowance can be designated any time of year. It just cannot be applied retroactively—only prospectively (from that point forward).
Falsifying housing allowance designations to appear compliant may lead to severe repercussions. For example:
To avoid missing housing allowance designations in the future, churches should consider these steps:
Not sure how to draft a housing allowance resolution? See our ready-to-use sample for guidance.
What is a housing allowance? A housing allowance is a portion of a minister’s compensation designated to pay for housing expenses, and it is exempt from income tax under IRS regulations.
Can a housing allowance be set mid-year? Yes, it can be set at any time of year. It must be done in the same manner as one set entering a new calendar year, but only applies from the date it is approved and going forward.
Can a housing allowance be changed mid-year? Yes, a housing allowance can be adjusted mid-year, but only for payments made after the adjustment is approved.
What expenses qualify for a housing allowance? Qualifying expenses include rent, mortgage payments, utilities, and furnishings, among others directly related to the minister’s housing.
Is a housing allowance taxable? Housing allowances are not taxable for federal income tax but are subject to self-employment taxes.
By understanding and adhering to these guidelines, churches can ensure compliance with IRS rules and protect both their financial integrity and their pastors’ benefits.
Understand the essentials of allocating a housing allowance, the number one tax benefit available to clergy today.
Last Reviewed: January 20, 2025
Allocating a Housing Allowance | Essential Guidelines for Churches
Understand the essentials of allocating a housing allowance and how churches can ensure compliance with tax regulations.
Ministers do not pay federal income tax on the amount of their compensation designated in advance by their employing church as a “housing allowance.” However, there are limits:
Sometimes ministers incur more housing expenses than anticipated, due to unforeseen repairs, buying a new home, or other factors. If a minister’s housing expenses exceed the designated allowance, they may lose the full benefit of this tax provision.
Ministers living in church-owned parsonages may also incur housing expenses beyond their designated allowance. Churches should consider amending the allowance to cover these additional expenses for the remainder of the year.
Church treasurers should ensure that housing allowances remain adequate. If a minister’s housing expenses exceed expectations, the church board can amend the allowance to make it larger. This:
An amendment may be appropriate under circumstances such as:
Key Point: Amending an allowance is optional, but it can prevent unnecessary tax burdens for ministers.
Pastor Dave owns a home and had a $15,000 housing allowance designated for 2013. After purchasing a more expensive home mid-year, his monthly expenses increased by $500. The church board can amend the allowance for the remainder of the year, reallocating a portion of his salary as housing allowance without additional cost to the church.
To prevent oversights, churches may adopt continuing resolutions that designate a portion of ministers’ salaries as housing allowances by default (e.g., 40%).
Tip: While useful as a safeguard, these resolutions should not replace annual housing allowance designations tailored to individual circumstances.
What if no housing allowance is designated? Housing allowances can only be applied prospectively. If no designation is made before January 1, the allowance will apply only to expenses incurred after the designation date. What expenses qualify for a housing allowance? Eligible expenses include rent, mortgage payments, utilities, furnishings, repairs, and property taxes. Can housing allowances be amended retroactively? No, IRS rules require that housing allowances apply only to future expenses. Does amending a housing allowance cost the church? No, it is simply a reclassification of the minister’s existing salary.
For more detailed guidance, consult Richard Hammar’s Church & Clergy Tax Guide.
How clergy taxes apply to pastors who choose to forego part of their salary for a tithe.
Last Reviewed: January 3, 2025
Q: I am a full-time pastor who is considered dual status for tax purposes. In the past, I have been given a certain amount for salary, of which I give back more than 10 percent in tithes. In the process of this money coming to me from the church and going back to the church again, the money gets taxed. Then I claim it as a charitable contribution. However, is it possible to simply turn down that amount and not be paid it by the church? In other words, if I was told I would be paid $50,000 for 2013, but I told the church to just pay me $45,000 so I wouldn’t have to pay taxes on that $5,000. I simply wouldn’t take it. Is anything wrong with this?
Under the “constructive receipt” doctrine of tax law, this arrangement does not reduce taxable income by the amount of the salary that is refused. Here’s why:
Unless specifically excluded by the tax code, such as in the case of housing allowances or 403(b) contributions, salary reductions remain part of taxable income.
The constructive receipt doctrine is a key concept in clergy taxes. According to this rule, taxable income includes all income that is credited to a taxpayer’s account, set aside, or otherwise made available without restriction. This applies even if the taxpayer chooses not to take the income.
In your example, the $50,000 salary is taxable because it was legally made available to you, even if you chose not to accept $5,000 of it. This refusal does not eliminate the tax liability for that portion of the salary.
Clergy can reduce taxable income through methods specifically allowed by the tax code. These include:
It’s important to work with a tax professional to ensure compliance and maximize eligible tax benefits.
No. Under the constructive receipt doctrine, income is taxable if it is made available, even if not received.
Yes. Examples include housing allowances and contributions to a 403(b) retirement plan.
No. Tithes are treated as charitable contributions and can be deducted separately but do not reduce taxable salary directly.
Yes. A tax professional can ensure compliance and help pastors maximize allowable deductions and exclusions.
Understanding the constructive receipt doctrine and applicable clergy tax rules is essential for pastors. By working with tax professionals and leveraging permitted exclusions, pastors can effectively manage their tax liabilities while supporting their churches.
Learn 5 effective ways to boost summer giving at your church and maintain a balanced budget despite seasonal attendance shifts.
Churches have historically dreaded summer due to one thing: giving. That’s because activities and costs peak with summer missions trips, camps, and vacation Bible school just as regular weekly contributions wane. The challenge for every church leader is to survive slow summer giving with a balanced budget.
The good news: It’s possible. The bad news: It will require more attention than you’ve likely given it in the past. If you want different results, you must be willing to shift your thinking, planning, and strategy.
There are, of course, the obvious tactics like boosting participation in online giving—especially recurring giving. As attendance during the summer months proves to be inconsistent, traditional giving during the weekly worship service can be dramatically affected. Recurring online giving can help solve that.
Another often-overlooked way to boost summer giving is to keep everyone connected to the church and church needs via email and social media. Too often, church communication is limited to what is spoken from the platform or what is printed in the church bulletin. While that is certainly efficient for the church, it is not necessarily effective when a portion of your congregation is expected to be vacationing.
These two actions are a good place to start, but there is so much more you can do. Here are five more ways to help boost your giving this summer.
This may seem like an odd suggestion to address summer giving, but incorrect data will negatively affect giving. Now is a good time to sift through your church management system and clean up your data, making sure you have correct addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and names. You can even enlist volunteers to collect the information with a personal touch! Everyone likes to know they matter.
Key point. Data integrity is essential to the value of your database. Your givers are people. Databases help leaders ensure no one gets lost or overlooked. Without accurate data, you cannot monitor, measure, and manage mission-critical information such as giving patterns, attendance habits, and event participation.
Video linked from an email and placed on your church’s social media is a great way to personalize a message from a pastor or ministry leader. In one to two minutes, you can share not only information but also inspiration transferred through nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, tone of voice, and posture.
Keep in mind that not everyone consumes content in the same way. Some people are visual. Some people are verbal. Either way, video messages are a great way to change things up and make your givers feel connected even if they can’t be present with you in real time.
Direct mail still draws a large percentage of nonprofit and religious giving. So, send three mailers throughout the summer: one to explain what will happen, one to describe what is happening, and one to celebrate what happened. Always include a courtesy reply offering envelope to prompt giving.
Key point. Many regular givers still prefer printed forms of communication. Reach the people who have already proven a preference to giving to your church, and prompt giving related to ministry updates or progress reports. Givers are more confident in giving—and giving a little extra—when they see ministry results.
People are more interested in stories about lives transformed than in event attendance rates. Make sure you clearly connect summer programs and events to changing lives.
Bottom line: Life change provides a soul-satisfying return on investment no dividend statement could compete with.
This takes a little more planning. Budget larger expenses when giving is higher, maybe in spring or fall. Then, commit to watching actual giving and actual expenses every 30 days. Adjust as needed.
Key point. Planning expenses to match cash flow is something every organization must do to remain financially viable. The closer you can keep actual expenses to actual giving, the more likely you’ll have a balanced budget at summer’s end instead of a deficit you’ll have to overcome.
Summer doesn’t have to be a financial roller coaster. Instead, it should be a time to celebrate life change, plan for the fall ministry season, and build momentum for the coming year. If you’ll take the necessary steps to adapt to your congregation’s shifting summer attendance and giving patterns, you can survive the slow summer giving season with a balanced budget. More importantly, you can be fully prepared to move forward with confidence into what God is calling your church to do next.
Discover valuable lessons and tips for church building projects, including budgeting, contractor selection, and fostering growth through challenges.
Last Reviewed: January 27, 2025
Three months after I began pastoring full-time, our church, which had been renting facilities for nearly 20 years, did the improbable: it won an auction for a deserted plastics factory. Suddenly, the church needed someone to manage the renovation process, to immerse himself in parking substrates and asbestos removal and sprinkler heads. I was chosen.
Realizing my knowledge of construction, on a good day, registered exactly zero, I called Dave, the executive pastor at a nearby church. “You’ve built two church buildings,” I said. “What do I need to know about building a church?”
Dave paused, I think weighing whether I was ready to hear the truth. “The six months before you move in and the six months after will be hideously expensive.”
I hung up and stared at the wall, overcome by the two painful realities of church construction.
Most church construction projects are led by pastors (like me), not by professional construction managers. Here’s how I turned my ignorance into an asset:
• Stand strong in what you do know. Lenders may be experts on loans, and contractors may be experts on construction, but you are the only person who knows two important things: what your congregation needs, and how much money you have. Frequently during construction, you will be told, “If we do this extra work now, it will be a lot cheaper than if you have to do it later.” That’s true, but if you don’t have the money in your construction budget, you don’t have it. As I like to say, “You can go broke saving money.”
According to the Journal of the American Planning Association, 90 percent of construction projects cost more than estimated—and it’s common for them to overrun expenses by 50 to 100 percent. Our church could not afford that common occurrence. Here’s what I learned about holding costs in check:
• Include an ample contingency fund. Our lender required a contingency fund of 3.7 percent of the project costs. I tried to talk the bank’s vice president into lowering that. Thankfully, she is a veteran banker and insisted we’d need it. We did. In hindsight, I wish we’d increased it to 5 or 6 percent.
• Move planned items to the wish list. Many items you’d hoped for and planned for will need to be placed on the Phase 2 wish list. We moved things to this list that we would dearly have loved, including a grand piano, a rear entry sign, and window shades for the sanctuary, but this kept our costs $500,000 lower, and we can add these items later.
• In construction years, try to keep other costs down. In 2012, our main construction year, we were able to save 6 percent of our budgeted expenses, and this helped when construction costs increased.
• Match up the numbers. During construction, three parties are tracking expenses: the bank, the contractor, and the church. I didn’t know, going in, that each party tracks those slightly differently. To avoid surprises, meet regularly to get updates and ask questions.
• Time equals money, so keep things moving. Every week of construction, you are paying just to have the contractor on site (what’s called “general conditions”). Therefore, keep things moving. What I did well: Bring a detailed project list to each building team meeting, to keep discussion on track and make sure nothing got missed. Then after the meeting, I emailed each person—?architect, contractor, interior designer, etc.—their to-do items. This saved time and cost. What I did not do well: I did not realize, a few times, that shop drawings were being held by our architect or interior designer, and until those were returned to the contractor, that part of construction could not proceed.
I’ve provided cautions, for your protection, but I’d be remiss if I left you afraid to move forward with a needed construction project. We love our new church building. After 20 years of setting up and taking down each Sunday, it feels so good to be home. The local newspaper featured our renovation on the front page, and we’ve welcomed hundreds of visitors and guests because of the building. Fellowship, evangelism, and children’s ministry have all greatly improved, simply because we now have spaces that better support them. Facilities really do facilitate.
Plus, during the project, our faith grew. As we came to each hurdle—zoning, capital campaign, environmental testing, cash flow—we were forced to depend more deeply upon God. As Scripture says, “Is anything too hard for the Lord?”
How did we do, bringing the building project in on budget? We came close. Final bills come in this month, but we estimate we went over by only 2 or 3 percent. Keeping construction costs in check may not be easy, but it is possible.
Steps for developing and maintaining a constitutionally sound effort.
Last Reviewed: July 23, 2025
The role of religion in public schools continues to spark legal and cultural debate. At the center is the First Amendment, which prohibits government-sponsored religion.
Yet under a program known as “released time,” public school students may receive religious instruction during the school day, provided certain guidelines are met.
Released-time programs allow public school students to:
Religious institutions—such as churches—can coordinate these programs, but they must comply with constitutional standards.
Two landmark Supreme Court cases define the limits of released-time programs:
In 2012, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision upholding a South Carolina law allowing high school students to earn academic credit for participating in released time programs. The court also deemed a South Carolina school district’s policy as permissible.
Key takeaway: Released-time programs are constitutional when kept separate from school operations and finances.
Churches and religious organizations must consult state statutes before starting a released-time program. Statutes vary significantly.
School Ministries, founded in 1990, now estimates more than 500 released time programs exist nationwide, with Alabama, Tennessee, Ohio, and Utah all adopting legal protections since the Fourth Circuit’s decisions in 2012.
To ensure compliance with the First Amendment, religious institutions must adhere to several principles drawn from state and federal court laws and court decisions.
Key takeaway: School officials did not promote the program, nor did employees of the religious organization enter the school to recruit attendees. A federal court of appeals ruled that this method of publicizing released time comported with the First Amendment.
Avoid:
Acceptable:
Court examples:
Preferred method: Program staff submit attendance to the school.
(See: Lanner v. Wimmer, Utah)
Religious institutions offering released-time programs should:
📚 For resources: Visit Church Law & Tax’s Reducing the Risk training.
Released-time programs offer a unique way for churches to connect with students, but they also carry legal responsibilities.
“Any released-time program, by its very nature, presents the potential for unconstitutional entanglement … For this reason, the least entangling administrative alternatives must be elected.”
— Lanner v. Wimmer, 662 F.2d 1349 (10th Cir. 1981)
We’ve used a combination of AI and human review to make this content easier to read and understand.
Understanding liability involving clergy, sexual misconduct, and counseling.
Last Reviewed: July 27, 2025
Ministers who engage in sexual conduct with adult members of their congregation not only expose their churches to civil liability—they also risk criminal prosecution. In many states, clergy who exploit their positions for sexual contact with congregants may face felony charges and imprisonment.
This article explores:
While civil lawsuits get much attention, ministers may also face:
These consequences often arise in the context of a counseling relationship but can also occur with staff or even non-members.
Case Reference: 2012 WL 5896779 (Minn. App. 2012)
Minnesota law criminalizes sexual penetration between a clergy member and a congregant if:
A trial court convicted the priest. Upon appeal, the appeals court found the statute was constitutional on its face, but the trial court improperly:
Outcome: Conviction reversed due to excessive government entanglement with religion.
At least 12 states explicitly criminalize sexual contact between clergy and adult counselees. These laws vary in language, but generally include clergy under definitions such as “psychotherapist,” “counselor,” or someone in a position of authority.
Arkansas: Class C felony if a clergy member uses a position of authority to engage in sexual acts with a counselee. Consent is not a defense.
Connecticut: Sexual contact during therapy by a clergyman is criminalized under second- and fourth-degree sexual assault laws.
Delaware: Defines clergy in a position of trust. Criminal contact under guise of counseling is deemed non-consensual.
Iowa: Sexual exploitation by clergy providing mental health services is criminalized.
Minnesota: Sexual penetration or contact during private religious counseling is a third- or fourth-degree offense.
New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin: These states have similarly specific statutes that criminalize clergy sexual misconduct when tied to counseling or positions of trust.
Some states criminalize counselor-counselee sexual conduct without explicitly naming clergy, but the definitions may apply:
Every state has laws criminalizing nonconsensual sexual contact. Clergy can be prosecuted under these general statutes.
Unwanted sexual contact may also constitute assault or battery.
Church insurance policies generally exclude intentional or criminal acts. Legal defense costs are not covered.
Clergy convicted of sexual misconduct may:
Clergy may be liable for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or similar state laws, especially in:
A female associate pastor in Minnesota sued her supervising pastor for repeated advances. Despite his argument of “consensual” behavior, the court ruled she could proceed with her harassment claim.
Ministers who engage in sexual conduct during counseling relationships may face:
Churches must:
We’ve used a combination of AI and human review to make this content easier to read and understand.
Conducting background checks for church employees is essential for safety but must be done responsibly to avoid discrimination and legal risks. Learn best practices, including timing, tailored policies, and compliance with federal and state laws.
Last Reviewed: January 28, 2025
Given child abuse by church employees, most attorneys recommend criminal background checks on employees that work with children and youth.
Churches also sometimes request credit reports on employees and applicants. This is because of the high rate of reported theft and fears of embezzlement.
Unable to resist a good idea, many churches have expanded these checks to include all job applicants.
But the extensive use of background checks may expose churches to unlawful discrimination based on race, origin, and color.
A well-known secular employer paid $3.1 million to settle a discrimination claim related to its use of background checks. It also agreed to change its policy regarding criminal background checks.
According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), more than 300 African American applicants were denied job opportunities with the company because something appeared in a criminal background check. According to the EEOC, excluding applicants based on the results of a criminal background check violate Title VII.
(Title VII is the law prohibiting employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.)
The commission says background check results may have a “disparate impact.” What they mean is that the checks may have a disproportionate negative effect on protected classes.
Now the National Labor Relations Board has issued guidance on when, and how, an employer can avoid creating those disparate impacts.
Assuming current incarceration rates remain unchanged, about 1 in 17 Caucasian men are expected to serve time in prison during their lifetime; by contrast, this rate climbs to 1 in 6 for Hispanic men, and to 1 in 3 for African American men. For men in their early thirties, African American men are about 7 times more likely to have a prison record than Caucasian men of the same age.
Minorities also have lower credit scores than Caucasians. According to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank in 2007, 22.6 percent of Caucasians had a bad credit score, while 65.9 percent of African Americans had a bad credit score and 42 percent of Hispanics had a bad credit score.
Based on the disproportionate presence of minorities with either criminal convictions or bad credit scores, an adverse employment decision based on a background check could mask unlawful discrimination against African Americans and Hispanics. If the background check is used at the beginning of the job search, the church has likely wrongfully excluded qualified African Americans and Hispanic individuals.
No one, including the EEOC, wants churches exposed to liability by hiring a sex offender or a convicted embezzler. The key to the proper use of the background check is using it at the right time for the right position and for the right reasons. When adverse information appears in a background check, the church needs to inquire further into the circumstances surrounding the adverse information.
Here are best practices churches should use when performing background checks:
Identify policies and procedures in your employment practices that are likely to have a disparate impact on a protected class of applicants and employees. For example, if your policy rejects an applicant for any criminal conviction, then your policy will have a disparate impact on minorities. Consider modifying your policy based on the specific crime committed (drug offense versus violent crime, felony versus misdemeanor, prison time versus probation), the length of time that has passed since the crime occurred, and the status of any rehabilitation.
Review job descriptions to determine whether the position requires a background check. You should focus on the dangers of particular crimes and the risks in particular positions. You should link the criminal conduct to the essential functions of the job in question. Your policy or practice must be job-related and consistent with the business necessity for criminal background screening. Your policy must demonstrate the relationship between the job and the risks associated with certain criminal convictions. Positions that deal with children, youth, and the elderly should exclude individuals with a history of sexual abuse, violent crimes besides sexual abuse, and crimes that deal with financial integrity. Positions that deal with finances need to exclude those that have been convicted of financial crimes and other crimes that deal with integrity, such as fraud. You should review and follow the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (http://www.uniformguidelines.com/uniformguidelines.html) that relate certain crimes to certain jobs. Job descriptions should list the justifications for the background check, the crimes that are automatic disqualifying factors, and the amount of time that must pass before these crimes become less of a factor in the employment process.
The particular facts and circumstances of each case should determine the duration of an exclusion from hiring. Relevant and available information to make this assessment includes, for example, studies demonstrating how much of the risk of recidivism declines over a specified time.
Do not ask for a background check in the initial application. Do not ask about arrests or charges that were made. When reviewing an applicant’s background report, only consider felony convictions or misdemeanor convictions that are related to the job description. Do not ask about bankruptcies or lawsuits until the job is conditionally offered.
Place a notice on your job application that a criminal conviction or a bad credit score is not an automatic denial to employment.
Comply with the Federal Fair Credit Report Act. The church should engage a reputable company to conduct the background check. The third-party company should give the church guidance about the church’s responsibilities as user of the report. The company should provide the appropriate forms to use with the applicant. The company should also provide forms and guidance if the report results in an adverse decision. Finally, the company should provide information about how to correct incorrect information. (Some companies report that up to 65 percent of the reports contain material errors.)
Give the applicant written notice of the potentially disqualifying information and give them an opportunity to explain the conviction and rehabilitation. You may ask whether he or she was not correctly identified in the criminal record, or if the record is otherwise inaccurate. According to EEOC guidance issued in April 2012, other relevant, individualized inquiries include:
Since the passage of time changes circumstances, you should secure written permission before updating the background check. Criminal background checks and credit reports should be repeated every three to five years. Some vendors offer continuous updating under the terms that you dictate. For example, you may request that you be notified if an employee’s criminal background check adds a new felony conviction, or if his or her credit score drops below a certain score. If the church uses this option, then make sure that the employee has consented to this arrangement.
Treat the background information as confidential. Do not discuss it with anyone who is not involved in the employment decision. Only use the background information for employment decisions. Do not use it for other church purposes.
The Federal Trade Commission enforces the law governing investigative consumer reports (criminal and credit reports). If the church verifies more than just position, dates of employment and compensation, notes from those conversations may be governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Whether the notes or the report from a consumer reporting agency, the church must take care to treat the background report as a private secure document. This means it needs to be located in a locked file cabinet (paper) or have the file encrypted and password protected (electronic). Disposal must also be secure. This means that paper reports must be shredded and electronic reports must be securely deleted so that they cannot be recovered.
Note that many states also have laws that govern the handling of background checks and consumer privacy. Churches should use third-party background checkers that understand applicable state laws. Churches will need to follow the most restrictive law governing background checks.
How to handle undocumented charges on the church credit card.
Last Reviewed: June 23, 2025
Q: Our associate pastors will not turn in their credit card receipts for business expenses. Our senior pastor would like to deduct any undocumented church credit card charges from the offending employees’ pay. I’m not sure this is legal. Of course, they know that they are never to use the card for personal expenses. We do not doubt some charges are legitimate church expenses. We trust our pastors, but we need to account for each transaction. Is it legal to deduct undocumented charges from their pay?
When an employee adequately accounts for charges, the payment qualifies as an “accountable” reimbursement. An accountable reimbursement does not count as taxable income.
For most business expenses, a reimbursement qualifies as accountable if it meets all four of the following requirements:
Under an accountable plan, the employee reports expenses directly to the church, not to the IRS.
In this case, the church does not report reimbursements as income, and the employee does not claim any deductions.
Can a church reduce an employee’s salary by the amount of nonaccountable charges it pays?
That depends on state law.
In many states, laws strictly prohibit employers from unilaterally reducing an employee’s wages, except in limited circumstances.
Churches should never reduce employee compensation to cover nonaccountable expense reimbursements without first consulting legal counsel.
The better approach is to deny reimbursement for nonaccountable charges made on an employee’s personal credit card. For repeated undocumented expenses made to an employee’s church-issued credit card, the church should revoke the card.
The best practice is to reimburse only those charges and expenses that meet the four requirements of an accountable plan, whether the charges and expenses are made to a church credit card or a personal one. If the church reimburses undocumented expenses, those amounts should be treated as taxable income to the employee.
We’ve used a combination of AI and human review to make this content easier to read and understand.
Allowing outside groups to use church property poses liability risks—understanding insurance coverage and legal precautions is essential for church leaders.
Last Reviewed: February 11, 2025
Churches often allow outside groups to use or lease their premises. Obviously, the use of church property by an outside group exposes the church to potential liability for injuries that may occur, and this risk escalates if the property is being used for an activity that involves minors. Consider the following examples.
Example. A church leases a portion of its premises one evening per week to a local scout troop.
Example. A church leases several rooms to an outside group to operate a preschool.
Example. A church leases a room one morning each week to an outside group for the operation of an exercise class
Churches respond to this risk in various ways. Many require the outside group to list the church’s name as an “additional insured” in its general liability insurance policy. A case in New York suggests that this practice may be unavailing and lull church leaders into a false sense of security.
A church leased a portion of its premises to an outside group for three days to conduct a dance competition. The lease required the group to name the school as an additional insured in its liability insurance policy.
A woman was injured when she fell on a sidewalk while walking from the parking lot behind the school to the front entrance in order to attend the dance competition. She sued the church, claiming that her fall was caused by the church’s negligence. The church contacted the outside group’s insurer and requested that it provide a legal defense of the victim’s claims and indemnification for any verdict or settlement. When the insurer refused, the church asked a court to compel it to do so.
The court noted that the insurance policy defined an “insured” to include any organization to whom the insurer was obligated, by virtue of a written contract, to provide liability insurance, “but only with respect to liability arising out of [its] operations.” In other words, the fact that the church was named as an additional insured on the policy did not mean that it was entitled to a legal defense and indemnification against any loss. The section in the policy limiting coverage to liability “arising out of [the insured’s] operations” required that there be “some causal relationship between the injury and the risk for which coverage is provided.”
The court concluded that the church failed to demonstrate the existence of such a causal relationship. The outside group’s “operations” consisted of conducting a dance competition in the school auditorium and three classrooms. Bodily injury occurring on a sidewalk outside the leased premises, in an area which the outside group had no responsibility to maintain or repair, “was not a bargained-for risk.” Rather, the group’s operations at the school merely furnished the occasion for the accident. Christ the King Regional High School v. Zurich Insurance, 936 N.Y.S.2d 680 (N.Y.A.D. 2012)
Many churches allow outside groups to use or lease their property. It is common for churches to require that an outside group’s insurance policy list the church as an additional insured. But as this case illustrates, such a practice will not necessarily provide coverage for the church in the event of an injury, especially one that bears no direct relationship to the nature of the outside group’s activities. This can result in an unexpected and potentially significant liability for the church.
The takeaway point is this: church leaders should not agree to the use of their property by outside groups on the assumption that being listed as additional insured in the outside group’s insurance policy will create an effective firewall against church liability. Before allowing outside groups to use or lease church property, discuss the issue of insurance with your insurance agent as well as legal counsel so that you clearly understand the availability of coverage under the outside group’s policy. On the basis of this information then, churches can make an informed decision on whether to allow the outside group to have access to church property and any additional precautions that may be necessary.
Before allowing outside groups to use or lease church property there are several points to consider, including the following:
Use of church property by an outside group will expose the church to potential liability, especially for activities involving minors.There is no way to create a “firewall” that insulates a church from all risk of liability under these circumstances. Churches should consider several risk management options before allowing church property to be used by outside groups.
All general liability insurance policies have a “named insured,” which generally is the entity that procured the insurance. The named insured can add one or more other entities as additional insureds.
Having your church’s name added as an additional insured” to the general liability policy of an outside group that uses or leases church property for a specified purpose or activity is one way that a church can manage the risk of liability in the event of an injury.
But, as this case illustrates, it is not fool-proof. Conditions apply, and church leaders need to be familiar with the conditions so they can accurately evaluate coverage.
The last thing you want to do is assume that having your church named as an “additional insured” will create an effective firewall when in fact this is not the case. So, it is important to discuss this option with your insurance agent, and legal counsel, so that you are fully informed concerning the viability of this option for managing risk.
The risks associated with the use of church property by outside groups can be mitigated in other ways.
Consider the following:
Check with the church’s insurance carrier to evaluate coverage in the event of an injury during use of church property by an outside group.
You must assess the increased risk of legal liability associated with the use of your property by outside groups. Some risks may be too great to even consider, especially when you consider the relatively modest user’s fee, if any, that will be assessed.
Any activity involving minors represents the highest risk. The outside group must provide evidence of insurance in an amount that is acceptable to you.
Have the outside group sign a “facilities use agreement” that:
Review the outside group’s liability policy to ensure that it provides adequate coverage. Be certain that it does not exclude sexual misconduct. Also, pay close attention to the coverage limits. Are they adequate?
Add the church as an additional insured under the outside group’s liability insurance policy. This may not be effective in all cases, but it will be in some and so is definitely worth doing.
If the group’s activities will involve minors, have a written acknowledgment from the group that all workers have been adequately screened.
Note that release forms are generally unenforceable against minors who are injured. This is because they have no contractual capacity to sign such a release. This is also because their parents or guardians lack the legal authority to release a minor’s legal rights.
Other issues to consider when a church allows outside groups to use or lease its facilities:
A church should seek legal counsel when considering the use of church property by one or more outside groups.